yot yot5 wrote:samuelthx wrote:My only complaint is that this adventure felt like a reading comprehension exercise, with me having to read between the lines for your very subtle clues (you're really good at giving cryptic hints).
So let me get this straight: you think the
adventure was bad because Lucky-Luc's
hints were too cryptic?
...Okay then.
Do you think that would be reasonable of me?
What I meant was that the adventure was based not on elements in-game, but on chomper
logic. I had absolutely no clue about what sort of trick had to be used. I tried many methods, but I didn't know the trick that was to be employed, since the logic exploited wasn't known in-game
at all (in contrast to the Flying-Blink trick). So the adventure became like a reading comprehension, forcing me to analyse and decode the hints to solve the adventure. Again, as I would like to point out, this isn't necessarily bad, but it's certainly unfair, hence my complaint.
EDIT: Just to let you get this straight:
1. I never did say this adventure was bad. I said it was amazing.
2. My complaint is not about the
hints. I love cryptic hints, and I try to give subtle clues when others ask for solutions
![Twisted Evil :twisted:](./images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif)
3. What my "complaint" (since it isn't really one)
is about--This adventure used a trick that (I presume) none of us knew about, and it became an adventure where I had to decode hints, instead of using in-game elements. AGAIN, I don't mind this type of adventure. Who wouldn't want to learn some new tricks?
Jutomi, if you don't wish to share the solution with everyone, do PM me. Although I think it would be nice if you did post it here, though.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)