New level - Simple two

mette · Post by **mette** » Tue Jun 07, 2005 2:07 pm

Hi all,

I'm not sure if this is as simple as 'Simple one'

, but at least nothing in this one will kill you

.

Enjoy

Mette

ol'gramma · Post by **ol'gramma** » Tue Jun 07, 2005 5:10 pm

This is a different kind of simple..

It requires thought and planning in a different way than the first one, but I enjoyed it equally as much.

O/G

rmelin13 · Post by **rmelin13** » Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:18 pm

Simple.... like an 'oban puzzle, this was a joy to work on, it was so simple.

Superb job Mette, this is my kind of 'simple' level. I generally don't look
at a level before diving in, I tend to dive in. With this one, you can do
both. Dive in, and then take a look at what you think you might need to
do. Then do something different. Then try it over and over again.

I liked this one very much.

majic1 · Post by **majic1** » Thu Jun 09, 2005 4:43 am

This definitely required some planning on my part - and then more planning. Simple - but not! This took me quite a few tries! I wonder if I could do it again?

Thanks for the fun, Mette!

mette · Post by **mette** » Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:08 am

Thank you

I'm glad you liked it

Mette

Liz Mayhew · Post by **Liz Mayhew** » Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:42 am

I enjoyed this one too Mette! I thought - this was designed by a maths teacher so there has to be a math way to do it

Very neat and enjoyable to solve.

Liz

mette · Post by **mette** » Thu Jun 09, 2005 7:43 am

Liz Mayhew wrote:this was designed by a maths teacher so there has to be a math way to do it

Mette

kaz67 · Post by **kaz67** » Thu Jun 09, 2005 3:43 pm

Sorry for delay - been building bridges in futile places for a while ... have just managed it .. very thought provoking and fun Mette.

Is Simple Three on it's way ??

Thanks

Kazza

Lillian · Post by **Lillian** » Sat Jun 11, 2005 8:53 am

mette · Post by **mette** » Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:14 am

Lillian wrote:

Should I read that as a plea for a hint?

Mette

Lillian · Post by **Lillian** » Sat Jun 11, 2005 9:19 am

I'm going to let my husband have a quick go at it later Mette - will get back to you - thanks

Gen · Post by **Gen** » Wed Jun 15, 2005 8:18 pm

mette wrote:
Lillian wrote:
Should I read that as a plea for a hint?

Mette

Me too! Yes, please.

mette · Post by **mette** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 1:16 pm

OK, here's a hint

:

I name the platforms clockwise from 1 to 8 starting with number 1 where Stinky starts.
You start at 1. Walk to 2. Build to 3 (you need to 'waste' a box here, but only one). Build to 1. Build to 8. Put one box in the lava towards 7. Walk to 7. Build back to 8. Walk to 4. Build to 5. Put one box in the lava towards 6. Walk to 6. Build back to 5. Walk to 4. Build to exit. Exit.

Let me know if you need something more specific

Mette

Gen · Post by **Gen** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 4:08 pm

Mette, thanks for the help! I don't think I would have been able to complete this one without it! The only part I got right on my own was where to build the bridge to the exit, that was no help unless you were able to collect the coins.

Very clever planning and design! Thanks for the fun and challenge!

Lillian · Post by **Lillian** » Thu Jun 16, 2005 5:52 pm

OK Mette - this one has finally been completed! I have been pulling my hair out

I just could not get this one at all!

Thanks for the "walkthrough" even with that I got it wrong a couple of times

Very clever level - thanks - now on to your other stinker TP one

mette · Post by **mette** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:36 am

Mette

Muzozavr · Post by **Muzozavr** » Wed Jul 25, 2007 10:47 am

Somehow I got this one on my second try!

Didn't even notice all the wrong ways of building the bridge to the exit until I solved the level.

Post by **Jutomi** » Tue Oct 03, 2023 4:45 pm

Hi Mette! Not too tricky, but always fun to come across these little bridging puzzles. Many thanks

My video solution~

Amnon · Post by **Amnon** » Wed Oct 04, 2023 2:30 am

Took me a few tries - thanks for the fun!

New level - Simple two

New level - Simple two

Re: New level - Simple two

Re: New level - Simple two