The Wonderland Board

Select.

POTZ.
Thanks for putting that up.

WA beta is sorta an early version of a game, but again - The editor is not a game.

IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS IT IS!!!!!

(Edited by Qloof - try not to stretch the page like that, please!)

Mine is Wa

atttitude overload alert.
i even r better than that.

You wish.

Break it up, you two. If you're going to argue, take it to PM's, not here.

And ^_^, don't stretch the page with huge messages like that. If you think the Editor's a game, that's fine, but just because you count it as a game doesn't mean everyone will.

And I would like to say the same thing to Deeman, about the post with the big letters in the other topic. If it's important to ^_^ that it's called a game; well OK, but I don't care much about it.

However, saying:

I don't even consider a question worth asking or arguing about.

and in the meantime keep arguing and yelling with big letters about it seems quite contradictory and inconsistent to me.

[off-topic]
Also I wonder why Deeman should be the one who's telling us which of the old topics should be moved from the old subforum to here, and which of the new similar topics in the new subforum should be locked, what happened at least twice now.

Please understand me well; personally I don't care that much about the "Toon town" and "Wonderland screenshots' topics, but if other people would like to talk about those things, while the old topics are not moved yet, (if they get moved) what's wrong with that? And why should those new topics be locked because Deeman says so? Is Deeman the new boss here perhaps?

RTW Platinum. Especially custom levels. Even if the custom levels would have been the only levels in RTW (No classic, de luxe, and platinum level sets) I still would call RTW a game, and I don't care about what Deeman says about it.

WAPOTZ. :3

Voted for the WA Beta - I love prototype stuff, so it caught my interest pretty heavily.

POTZ :3

‎

^_^ has hacked Emerald's account.

Why do people keep voting for POTZ stuff when they're not even out yet?

‎

Kooky, Good question! I don't know. Perhaps because it's new, and some people like new things even if it's not proved yet that they are good.

BTW, I thought ^_^ made also an option: WA editor, or did I see that wrong? Anyhow, Emerald, please don't bother about Deeman's nonsense. If you like the WA editor, that's just fine.

A MOD REMOVED WA EDITOR OPTION. ADD IT NOW.

I agree. Removing or changing such things in a post or poll by a MOD, is against human rights to state their opinion. Although the matter what this opinion is about (if the editor is a game or not) is important in lots of other peoples opinion, it IS important that people are free to state their opinion.

So whoever changed the poll, please change it back!

Re-added it. Not sure who deleted it though.

Qloof, I think it's good that you (as far as I know) always say if you change or delete something as a MOD. Thanks.

Actually I think every MOD should do that. There is no doubt that any of you MODs will once in a while do something that other people (for example: I) don't agree with, and if that happens there is always the possibility to have a good talking about it and probably to come to an agreement. If MODs are going to change things secretly, that's not possible.

I think it's not important to know who of the other MODs deleted the WA-editor option. All I want to ask the other MODs is: Whatever you do, using your "MOD-power"; Please make clear what you did, make clear that is was you, who did it, and if possible also why you did it.

Thanks in advance.

Can people still vote?
It won't let me vote.
Can a mod edit this?

I already voted when I said RTW platinum. Didn't you vote earlier?

I did vote for WA editor, but someone removed it, making the option reset when Qloof added it.
Thank you very much to the mod who deleted the option.

I checked it out on another forum:

A moderator can change a poll, deleting, changing or adding options, but not reset the entire poll. Everyone who voted, has voted, no matter if the option is deleted.

I made a poll with 4 options and I voted 2. Then I deleted 2, but I couldn't vote again, although the poll showed there were 0 votes. My vote was simply lost.

So actually, changing a poll after one person has voted makes the entire poll useless. If it's really very important to you then all you can do is make an entire new poll.

I LIKE RTWP

DEVINT wrote:I LIKE RTWP

Great! Now we only need one more vote, and then we are equal with the people who think: "No matter what happens; Future will be better."

What's with all the votes for a game that isn't even out yet?

The WA3 update topic.