- If mommy and daddy are both at work, and the kids are home alone, everything on the forum should be G,
but,
- If mommy or daddy is looking over their kids shoulder, it may be PG,
also
- If we have here a usergroup of 13+ members, and a subforum only accessible for them, we can post there PG13 stuff. (In case of a 18+ group, we can post links to X-rated movies. )
And in the end, the decision what's supposed to be G, PG, and such, that's up to Donald Duck, right?
[Off-topic]That reminds me of a funny story by a Dutch cabaretier, such as a comedian, but actually more funny. Since most of you don't speak Dutch I'll not post the link to it, but I'll try to describe a bit: I hate DD, I hate him veeeeery much! You know why? Because he's always walking in his bare butt. (butt is a good word he? Not PG13 or such, otherwise I say "behind". Or let me say: naked butt, so I can abbreviate it to NB) No matter what he's doing, sitting at home, walking on street, going to a shop or a cinema. When he goes fishing he's suddenly wearing long boots, but still in his NB. EXCEPT, and that's the stupid thing, when he goes swimming! He's suddenly wearing swimming pants then! [/Off-topic]
But seriously, I wonder if Patrick is going to make a 13+ usergroup. Because it's impossible to check if thei're telling their true age. You know, it's easy to click the button: "I'm 13 years or older". A little baby can do it. And even if the kids are honest and ask their parents permission, do you really believe that mommy or daddy is going to look over their kids shoulder all the time they're surfing on internet? So, if we take it strictly, everything should be G? Forget it.
You know, since the current rule says such as: "Play nice, and remember there are also little kids here on the forum", I have the idea that I've just enough "common sense" to decide what can and what not. But if it depends on Donald Duck...... The whole PG-stuff is just as the dirty brown stuff, "what a bull drops on the ground" to me.Tyteen wrote:Should be good for now
I don't quite understand. Are you telling me that this forum is dangerous because Wonderland is a family game? I would just think that other forums are more dangerous.Quote:
About internet safety, I doubt if it's that bad on this forum. Maybe at some obscure other forums.
See above for reply.
I was just trying to say that those kids don't really have parental guidence. And I don't believe the kids on this forum are coming to my home with a knife to kill me.but the point is kids may become bad without parental guidance.
I think the rule does make sense. If I would say to you : My friend, while I actually mean: You son of a ... , I think it would be good if I make clear it's meant sarcastic. (But don't worry though, I think you're OK )I mean the rule.
Aah, you know how to bring it an exciting way, I like blindfolded girls. But well, I think you're right about that. Everyone needs some common sense, and a thing that doesn't know anything but the difference between 0 and 1, can't really be a judge. However, if you want everything to be described in rules, it seems to me that you want to reduce the need for common sense as far as possible, which means in my opinion, that you also should do that if it's about how many times a rule may be broken in how long time, and after how long time a rule-break may be forgotten. Even more because those things are much easier to decide without using common sense, then to make the decision if a rule is broken or not. (Still I've no idea what tl;dr means but, nevermind)the blindfolded girl
Absolutely!Opinions from different sides are always good for desicions.
Not sure if that's just an example or something that really happened. Anyhow, if someone keeps breaking a rule for several times, and I say friendly: Please don't do that, it may not help. But when I try to give a clear explanation that he/she is breaking a rule, and what may happen if he/she continues to do that, (of course not at an angry way) it may have more chance to succeed.Also there is a difference on a friendly reminder and backseat modding:
-The whole post is only about what rule you broke
-Reference to punishment decided by you (You should not spam. As a result I am going to tell the mods to ban you)
I wonder if that's true. I think if people are really interested in Wonderland and this forum it should be no problem. But in case you're right, there always should be things changed with the PHP-software. And I don't know much about that, but maybe Tyteen can tell.Qloof wrote:Probably, but the problem would be people who don't bother trying to understand it or don't notice it more than anything else.
I got the idea that most internet websites are using kooky's. (Yea Kooky is very popular on internet. ) So let's say when a new user comes to this forum, all posts are expanded, just as they are now in the old situation. So, for the new members, nothing changes. Unless they (or we) decide to collapse all posts, and only expand those posts which we want to see again. Well, since Qookie has a great memory, the next time we go to this forum, only the posts we want to see are expanded (including the new ones) and the rest is collapsed. So, if we want to read a topic, and only have the interesting posts visible, instead of scrolling up and down all the time, we have time to.... for example.... eat a cookie!