The Ridiculous Ranting Sock (youtube series)
The Ridiculous Ranting Sock (youtube series)
He rants about stuff he hates. I'm thinking of another rant for him and it'll be more better. click here. Enjoy
-
DEEMAN223344
- Rainbow MegaStar
- Posts: 3145
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:07 pm
Ranting Sock has met his match.
In contrast to my previous letters, I'm not planning on spending much space in this letter proving that Ranting Sock is burdened with a dead weight of the most mudslinging conceptions and prejudices. Most people already seem to understand that. Instead, I'll be discussing Sock's biased apologues and how Sock uses them to sap people's moral stamina. Whoa! Don't stampede for the exits! I promise I'll get to the main topic of this letter, Sock's blowsy, surly crusades, in just a few sentences. I simply feel it's important first to provide some additional context by mentioning that in a tacit concession of defeat, Sock is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what his immature, homicidal ventures have failed at.
Every so often you'll see Sock lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for skewering me over a pit barbecue, and vow never again to be so illaudable. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that he says that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. But then he turns around and says that it's naive to teach the most yellow-bellied bottom-feeders I've ever seen about tolerance. You know, you can't have it both ways, Sock. What he is incapable of seeing is that when I'm through with him he'll think twice before attempting to regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers. Okay, then, let's move onto the really good part of this letter, the part in which I get to tell you that Sock has blood on his hands. Yet he pretends to be an innocent lamb who has our best interests at heart. We all know the reality: If Sock really had our best interests at heart, he wouldn't hasten society's quiescence to moral pluralism and epistemological uncertainty.
Even though Sock has aired his disapproval of being criticized, I still avouch that he uses highfalutin terms like "anarchoindividualist" and "ultraphotomicrograph" to conceal his plans to mortgage away our future. In this scheme of his, a mass of grandiloquent words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. We become unable to see that Sock has been trying for some time to convince people that officialism is a noble goal. Don't believe his hype! Sock has just been offering that line as a means to replace intellectual integrity with blasphemous sloganeering. I suppose that's all I have to say in this letter. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.
In contrast to my previous letters, I'm not planning on spending much space in this letter proving that Ranting Sock is burdened with a dead weight of the most mudslinging conceptions and prejudices. Most people already seem to understand that. Instead, I'll be discussing Sock's biased apologues and how Sock uses them to sap people's moral stamina. Whoa! Don't stampede for the exits! I promise I'll get to the main topic of this letter, Sock's blowsy, surly crusades, in just a few sentences. I simply feel it's important first to provide some additional context by mentioning that in a tacit concession of defeat, Sock is now openly calling for the abridgment of various freedoms to accomplish coercively what his immature, homicidal ventures have failed at.
Every so often you'll see Sock lament, flog himself, cry mea culpa for skewering me over a pit barbecue, and vow never again to be so illaudable. Sadly, he always reverts to his old behavior immediately afterwards, making me think that he says that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. But then he turns around and says that it's naive to teach the most yellow-bellied bottom-feeders I've ever seen about tolerance. You know, you can't have it both ways, Sock. What he is incapable of seeing is that when I'm through with him he'll think twice before attempting to regiment the public mind as much as an army regiments the bodies of its soldiers. Okay, then, let's move onto the really good part of this letter, the part in which I get to tell you that Sock has blood on his hands. Yet he pretends to be an innocent lamb who has our best interests at heart. We all know the reality: If Sock really had our best interests at heart, he wouldn't hasten society's quiescence to moral pluralism and epistemological uncertainty.
Even though Sock has aired his disapproval of being criticized, I still avouch that he uses highfalutin terms like "anarchoindividualist" and "ultraphotomicrograph" to conceal his plans to mortgage away our future. In this scheme of his, a mass of grandiloquent words falls upon the facts like soft snow, blurring the outlines and covering up all the details. We become unable to see that Sock has been trying for some time to convince people that officialism is a noble goal. Don't believe his hype! Sock has just been offering that line as a means to replace intellectual integrity with blasphemous sloganeering. I suppose that's all I have to say in this letter. If there are any points on which you require explanation or further particulars I shall be glad to furnish such additional details as may be required.
i should change my signature to be rude to people who hate pictures of valves