The Wonderland Board

Emerald141 wrote:Plus you get more credit for your work.

Also, I agree with some characters being noted as female... if it seems more likely that they are, they should be noted as such. Though the only two I can think of that could be are Zoopi Lala and Jaana.

EDIT: And I suppose Qookie.

What about Zoopi Lala seems female to you? I think Pootsy is a more likely female.[/nottryingtostartanargument]

He ended his nottryingtostartanargument, so now he is trying to start an argument.

I personally don't see any of the official stinkers being female, except maybe Jaana.

The problem is everything is uncertain, so everybody has their own opinions.

‎

It is fixed now.

EDIT: SPAM ALERT!

Oh god. Who is it now?

MichaelDotsonzyi.

Oh wow.

Sigh I was going to make Pootsy's page

Sorry.

‎

Emerald141 wrote:The wiki's broken again.

EDIT: As is 3.studIo! SOMETHING'S WRONG.

I noticed that there were a lot of spambots visiting the forum, causing the whole website to be down. I have fixed this, though.

Also, please note that we will have a maintenance on Sunday. More details here: http://3ps.hk-diy.net/forum/showthread. ... 8#post7808

Ban this.
Delete this.

That's actually really interesting, on the NFW forums we had a user named Lydia who has only posted once and it was a topic about house insurance or something, I eventually locked the topic.

‎

Does your register thing have a captcha(sp?) code or something like that?

MyNameIsKooky wrote:Does your register thing have a captcha(sp?) code or something like that?

Not yet. I am going to add reCAPTCHA, Human Verification questions, and possibly StopForumSpam.com check.

Only if there's a MediaWiki plugin like that.

@Emerald: I don't want to manually activate account everyday so... nah.

I think you should add security as stages, start with reCaptcha, and if spam still resides then add another layer of security.

StinkerSquad01 wrote:I think you should add security as stages, start with reCaptcha, and if spam still resides then add another layer of security.

Just add them all, at the same time. More efficient.

StinkerSquad01 wrote:That's actually really interesting, on the NFW forums we had a user named Lydia who has only posted once and it was a topic about house insurance or something, I eventually locked the topic.

For those who wanna see it, look here: http://noobfreeworld.forumotion.ca/t86- ... s-in-kochi

I think Lydia isn't a spambot, considering -gender here- put the topic in the propper forum. Don't spambots usaly just shove spam topics in the first forum availible? (in this case, Safety)

No. It's a topic made by a spambot.

Well, the topic was put in the right forum. But it does seem like that. Besides the only people on the NFW forums that aren't from these ones I know in real life.

The link inside the post indicates that it is a topic made by spambots, regardless of place.

Oh, ok. I know allmost nothing about spambots, so yeah.

I ended up totally forgetting about it.

Rescheduling to... dunno

More SPAM; see recent changes.

Lately I have discovered that users are having conflicts between solutions.

Please DO NOT directly remove these alternative solutions provided by others, instead please put them near, and indicate that it is an alternative solution. If you have experimented the alternative solution and finds it not working, please clearly describe what happens after you try each step that makes the solution not work.

Please do not address attribution to your own work in the page, they are addressed automatically in the changelog. If the work was referenced by an external source, please add <cite>[Reference URL or book goes here]</cite> tag next to the work.

In the next update (read: forever) I will include a new <solution> (or <spoiler>, depends on my mood to edit) tag that you can use to hide solutions. After that update, it will be mandatory to hide all solutions using that tag.

By the way, WonderWiki is hiring an administrator. He/she will need to maintain WonderWiki, and keep the articles up to standard. Please PM me with your WW username and a short paragraph describing why you should be hired as a WW admin (a few sentences are not acceptable, nor are 6,000 words novel-like things recommended.) I will not accept applications made by applicants who does not have a WW account.

tyteen

Lately you have noticed that there has been one conflict between solutions.

This is because the one that I didn't create doesn't work.

This is the situation you will be in if you follow the incorrect solution:

tyteen4a03 wrote:short paragraph
a few sentences are not acceptable

MyNameIsKooky wrote:

tyteen4a03 wrote:short paragraph
a few sentences are not acceptable

This is not acceptable: lemme be admin because I can help *end of pm*

@BB: Please put it into the Change summary field.