NO! I DON'T WANT THAT!Wonderman109 wrote:All in all, peace, guys?
You don't need to apologize for anything. It's my fault for making this topic.yot yot5 wrote:Please: Tell me the TRUTH. WHY did you upload this adventure? If it was all some kind of a joke, then I'll apologize. I'll apologize that I jumped to conclusions and thought that you deliberately wanted me to review this adventure badly. I'll apologize for saying that you hate me.
Extreme measures over something as petty as this?yot yot5 wrote:On the other hand... If you keep using the "THIS ADVENTURE IS EPIK" excuse, I'll have to take extreme measures. Hopefully somebody can beat some sense into you.
This is just the beginning!DEEMAN223344 wrote:End topic. Forever.
DEEMAN223344 wrote:You fail satire forever.
Wonderman109 wrote:Your adventure 'GOOD' is making fun of it. And some of the first comments added to that implicitly. When yotyot's argument reveals the joke explicitly, it turns out that that's exactly what you were doing.
This isn't satire. No one seriously makes adventures that are this bad, and things aren't heading towards that direction. Well, the Custom Adventures forum is pretty much dead right now (except for the discussion of this wonderful adventure), but that's different.DEEMAN223344 wrote:I don't know who you're making fun of. If anything, the younger users are getting BETTER at making adventures, apparently.
No one ever started.DEEMAN223344 wrote:Please stop attacking yot yot.
You seem to keep forgetting that I've never banned you from Epigam.DEEMAN223344 wrote:This has even happened to me several times, and has resulted in me getting banned from here, or the chat (most times at the hand of Emerald), or Epigam.
This argument has sides? Um, what sides are there?DEEMAN223344 wrote:That's actually a good representation of both sides.
during mnikSammy_P wrote:inb4 mnik
I made this topic for 3 reasons:Emerald141 wrote:MNIK, could you explain what your initial purpose was in creating this topic, and give a serious response this time? It would help to settle a lot of the confusion.
1. I was bored and wanted to make an unfunny adventure.
2. I knew very well that this adventure was unfunny when I made it. I also knew that this community overreacts to things they think were supposed to be funny jokes, and it certainly did!
3. I'm a masochist.
Their own problem!Wonderman109 wrote:It became serious when people reacted to it...
Of all the "real quotes" you've posted, I don't know where any of them came from. Unless they're like 4 years old, in which case they probably wouldn't be accurate anymore anyways.Wonderman109 wrote:Serious misconception there, dude. How is that making other people look dumb? Plus, they are real quotes- just from other topics. They are often from similar topics.
If this topic was really created from a lack of self-control, I'd never be bored again!Wonderman109 wrote:I don't blame you for not realizing you were, but different people read things differently. You say you can't control the Internet...well then, all you can do is control yourself.
Because you're playing as Pyro.Wonderman109 wrote:Ha-ha. Very funny. The point is that the jokes spread like wildifre, as one of my teachers often says, and then often it turns ugly. Why start a fire for no good reason.
Wonderman109 wrote:Personally, you two sound a little mean in your posts often to me, but that's just my view and probably you don't see it that way.
llarson wrote:Well a joke topic isn't all that funny when it's directed at you basically.
This topic wasn't meant as a personal attack to anyone in particular, so if you were hurt (which I'm 95% confident that someone was) I apologize. And "joke adventure" is an overstatement.Wonderman109 wrote:If you see misunderstandings keep happening with these joke adventures, don't make them.
Sarcasm is fun.Wonderman109 wrote:Sarcasm from yet another person, Deeman...let's see how many people have been sarcastic so far...everyone who has posted more than once here except SS01, me, Nobody, and yotyot!
Still better than being serious.Wonderman109 wrote:Now you are acting just like MNIK - again.
Good job! Now find the 10,000,000 others! It's not like I put any thought into this "argument" anyways!Wonderman109 wrote:I've found a flaw in his logic!
HOW BORING!Wonderman109 wrote:*sigh* I hate this argument.