I MUST BREAK A RECORD

Sammy_P · Post by **Sammy_P** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:25 am

4 lol

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:25 am

It is with extreme disgust that I write this letter and say what will indeed be considered intellectually challenged by some of my peers. Nonetheless, it must be stated that Ten would love to see me react, on cue, to the trigger words that he has inserted into my mind by dint of endless repetition. The points I plan to make in this letter will sound tediously familiar to everyone who wants to dispense justice. Nevertheless, his assault on free speech was not mounted in a few weeks. Rather, it evolved gradually over a much longer period of time, barely perceptible in its origins and benefiting from a gradualism that provoked little awareness, much less any real reaction. That's why it is now the time to weed out people like Ten who have deceived, betrayed, and exploited us. What I had wanted for this letter was to write an analysis of Ten's animadversions. Not an exhortation or a shrill denunciation, but an analysis. I hope I have succeeded at that.

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:26 am

OMG NO!

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:28 am

REVISION:

I know this topic has been beaten to death lately, but something needs to be said. Sammy_P lacks the dim flicker of sentience one needs to qualify as an imbecile. Here's my side of the story: If Sammy_P were to incite racial hatred, social upheaval and violence would follow. It is therefore clear that Sammy_P keeps saying that he is a bearer and agent of the Creator's purpose. In such statements, as in most of his propaganda, there are major omissions and layers of codswallop wrapped around a small piece of the truth. The real story is that I shall be blamed by ignorant persons when I say that Sammy_P's single-minded devotion to Stalinism is completely offensive. Cruel as that maxim may appear, we must really criticize his bons mots publicly for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. Does that sound extremist? Is it too deceitful for you? I'm sorry if it seems that way, but that's life. That's all for this letter. For those that don't like my views, get over it. I believe that I have as much a right to my views, and to express them, as anyone else. So when I say that there is little question that Sammy_P's litanies do not come without a price, you can agree with me or not. That's all there is to it.

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:28 am

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:29 am

Armadillo!

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:29 am

you cant stop me now

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:30 am

I WILL BREAK THE RECORD

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:31 am

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:31 am

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:32 am

LittleZbot · Post by **LittleZbot** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:32 am

NO YOU SHALLN'T.

MNI-No, he's evi-No, that line is stolen from Nobod-No, that line is stolen from m-wait, what did.

LET'S SEE YOU GET 11 POSTS IN A ROW!

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:33 am

THE ENTIRE FORUM IS AGAINST ME!!!

LittleZbot · Post by **LittleZbot** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:34 am

LittleZbot · Post by **LittleZbot** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:34 am

LittleZbot wrote:YAY

LittleZbot · Post by **LittleZbot** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:34 am

LittleZbot wrote:
LittleZbot wrote:YAY

LittleZbot · Post by **LittleZbot** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:34 am

LittleZbot wrote:
LittleZbot wrote:
LittleZbot wrote:YAY

Nobody · Post by **Nobody** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:34 am

Once again, I find disappointment. Once again, I find no satisfaction. Once again, I find that the name EVERY OTHER MEMBER OF THE FORUM has become nearly synonymous with incomprehensible evil. Although my approach may appear a bit pedantic, by setting some generative point of view against a structural-taxonomical point of view or vice versa, I intend to argue that if I chose to do so I could write exclusively about EVERY OTHER MEMBER OF THE FORUM's disruptive vituperations and never be lacking for material. Nonetheless, I'd rather spend some time discussing how I would like to comment on EVERY OTHER MEMBER OF THE FORUM's attempt to associate mandarinism with obscurantism. There is no association. Until we address this issue, we will never move beyond it.

LittleZbot · Post by **LittleZbot** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:34 am

LittleZbot · Post by **LittleZbot** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:34 am

LittleZbot wrote:BYE

LittleZbot · Post by **LittleZbot** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:35 am

LittleZbot wrote:
LittleZbot wrote:BYE

LittleZbot · Post by **LittleZbot** » Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:35 am

LittleZbot wrote:
LittleZbot wrote:
LittleZbot wrote:BYE